October 16th, 2009
Recent reports have shown social media sites to be female concentrated. What about the rest of the internet? Women may be using social networks more but that still doesn’t account for all the other types of websites.
While social networks may be big with females, internet usage in the United States seems to be split about 50/50 with men and women:
- News outlets are the primary focus with males.
- CNet, Reuters, IGN, Time, Drudgereport are all predominantly male.
- Shopping destinations are the primary focus with females.
- JCPenney, CBS, Pronto, Pogo, Overstock are all predominantly female.
*All stats from Quantcast except for MTV, BBC.co.uk, Simplyhired, Pronto, Newsweek and Fancast which come from Google Ad Planner.
Tags: analysis, analytics, bbc, cbs, demographics, drudgereport, fancast, females, gender demographics, Google, ign, internet women, jcpenney, meatsurement, men and women, mtv, newsweek, quantcast, reuters, shopping, simplyhired, statistical analysis, statistics, stats, using social networks
Posted in analysis, featured, technology | No Comments »
October 14th, 2009
It’s quite interesting that while Google gives in depth information about many other websites around the world with Google Ad Planner yet it gives no information on its own site. That’s not exactly the case below as we can see Quantcast gives full data on Google.com:
Why doesn’t Google want you to know about their data? Is it because their traffic is flat and has been flat for the last 6 months?:
As you can see below in depth demographics data IS available, just not from Google:
Some quick demographics from Google:
- 67% of users are between 18-49 and is above the Internet average.
- 78% are Caucasian but this is below the Internet average.
- 15% are Asian, Hispanic and Other. This may seem small but their usage of Google is higher than normal.
- 58% make $60K+, so Google’s usage amongst monetary classes is split pretty evenly.
- 58% have attended College and Grad School. What’s interesting here is that as education goes up the concentration of users in the more educated groups goes up as well.
Whatever Google’s reasoning is, the fact of the matter is that their data is out there yet they don’t want you to have it via their tools.
Tags: analysis, business, consumer, consumer demographics, consumers, data, data traffic, demographic data, demographics, depth demographics, gender demographics, Google, google ad planner, internet average, knowledge, marketing, measurement, selling, Value
Posted in analysis, business, featured | 1 Comment »
October 12th, 2009
Upon pulling demographics for a general analysis overview of the internet I realized that Google’s information in Google Ad Planner is very much different than Quantcast’s information. I tend to believe Quantcast a bit more because of the simple fact that certain sites can be “quantified”. What that entails is a website adds some code to their site so Quantcast can track all of their traffic and demographic data.
To test my theory that Google isn’t giving proper stats I took the gender demographics of the top 100 sites in traffic that were quantified and compared them with Google Ad Planner stats. The problem with Google vs. Quantcast is that there are limited stats that both agree on. Gender and children in household are the only two that sync up as there are ONLY two options, male & female and yes & no respectively. Other stats like household income, age range, and even college attended don’t quite match up, as both sites have chosen different division points for stats.
As you can see below Quantcast’s directly measured stats for males are in blue while the Google Ad Planner comparison stats are in red:
In the following table you can see the difference in percentages between Quantcast and Google Ad Planner. In almost all instances Google Ad Planner is shy of the actual target. Google is only equal with Quantcast once and is off as much as 13 percent:
The bottom line is this: don’t rely on just one source for your analytics and statistics. Google may be a reliable name to many but unless they’re actually measuring data on the company’s behalf then they’re just guessing at best. If ever in doubt use the wisdom of the crowd. Choose many sources and take the average of all of them. It may not be the best solution (the best would be direct measurement) but when you have no other option finding out the hidden wisdom of the crowd may be your best bet.
Tags: actualities, actuality, analysis, analysis overview, analytics, demographic data, demographics, gender demographics, Google, google ad planner, measurement, quantcast, quantified, statistical analysis, statistics, stats, sync, traffic
Posted in analysis, business, featured | No Comments »
September 18th, 2009
I know we’d all like to think our brands are original, given to us by divine inspiration – but they’re not. Regardless if youre just starting out or have been in business for many years, we all are influenced on a day to day basis.
All of your past experiences, biases, likes, dislikes and predispositions all affect your decision making process. You also must account for anyone else who influences the brand. This includes key internal players in messaging, imaging and managing among others as well as external influencers of customers, competitors and partners. Add all of this to the influence of pop culture and media consumed and you have a tremendous amount of influence.
With all the forces vying for dominancy what can you do?
• HUMANIZE: Start thinking about your brand as a human. Each and every human has a personality with likes and dislikes.
• PERSONIFY: Create categories where you can list your brand’s preferences in music, art, literature, movies etc. The sky’s the limit here.
• SPECIFY: Give your brand specific attributes. If it were a human what would it’s demographics be? Gender, age, race, income etc
• ANALYZE: Analyze all of these attributes and figure out what feeling your brand conveys. Is your brand a posh upper east sider that comes from money and summers in the Hamptons?
• ATTRIBUTE: Based on your brand personality analysis what clothes should your brand wear aka what are it’s coloring, styling & imaging attributes.
• SYNC: How do others regard your brand? How do you want your brand to be received? Now that you know how your brand looks & who your brand is you need to make sure that the words coming out of your brand’s mouth syncs up with your image.
We as humans are always changing. New influences come into out lives daily and must be acted upon. Your brand functions in the same way. It’ll always be the same “person” at the core but it must be flexible adaptable and aware of decisions to change on a concious level. Remember, you are what you “eat”.
Tags: advice, attributes, benefit, biases, brand, brand personality, branding, business, communicating, communication, communications, consumer, consumers, conversation, core values, corporate message, cradle to grave, cross country race, customer relationships, decision making process, decisions, demographics, divine inspiration, endurance, experiences, feelings, foster innovation, gender age, goals, influencers, interaction, interactions, life, lifeblood, lists, long term relationship, marketing, network, networking, passion, person smile, personality analysis, pop culture, productivity, purchase decisions, retention rate, selling, social, sprint, sync, term rewards, Value, wisdom
Posted in branding, business, featured | 1 Comment »
September 17th, 2009
Go look at something. What’s your first impression? That’s what counts. When people say first impressions are the most important this needs to be paid attention to, especially for your brand.
Your potential customer takes in everything about your brand at the point of contact. Your colors, fonts, wording and text shapes, and graphics all affect their purchase decision. What message is your brand conciously and subconsciously conveying?
Is your target market accurately receiving your message visually? What is the feeling your are looking to convey? Designing a brand that communicates your message effectively is so much more than colors text and image.
The most powerful brands know how to strike a balance between all of these elements. Any designer worth their salt knows that there’s a limit to the amount of colors, fonts, graphics and the scale and placement of all of these elements. The Golden Ratio is a good guideline to test this crucial balance.
People are generally intuitive. If you want to know how it feels to your custom er put yourself in their shoes. Envision yourself AS them, down to the precise specifics of their demographics. Are you a stay at home mom with 3 young kids concerned with family values and on a budget? Well now you are.
Separate your head from your heart then bring them back together. How does your brand feel to you? Now how does it seem to you logically? This is exactly what your potential customer is going through.
Take the time to account for your brand’s intangible qualities and you’ll see tangible reults in your bottom line.
Tags: advice, attributes, benefit, bottom line, brand, brand messages, branding, business, communicating, communication, communications, conciously, consumer, consumers, conversation, core values, corporate message, cradle to grave, cross country race, customer relationships, demographics, endurance, family values, feelings, first impression, first impressions, foster innovation, goals, golden ratio, intangible qualities, interaction, interactions, life, lifeblood, lists, long term relationship, marketing, network, networking, passion, person smile, point of contact, productivity, purchase decision, purchase decisions, retention rate, selling, social, specifics, sprint, target market, term rewards, Value, wisdom
Posted in branding, business, featured | No Comments »
